National Assistive Technology Act Data System
Annual Progress Report - Full Report
Puerto Rico 2017
General Information
Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)
Lead Agency
Implementing Entity
Program Director and Other Contacts
Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director
Certifying Representative
State Financing
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | No |
B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services
1. Overview of Activities Performed
| How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
|---|
C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost
1. Overview of Activities Performed
| How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 01 |
|---|
Activity 1
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | AT Fabrication Program |
|---|
2. Geographic Distribution and Number of Individuals Served
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 35 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 00 |
| C. Total Served | 35 |
| Performance Measure | Number |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 35 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price |
Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold |
Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 01 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech communication | 02 | $118 | $0 | $118 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 02 | $207 | $7 | $200 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 05 | $1,427 | $4 | $1,423 |
| Daily living | 08 | $953 | $33 | $920 |
| Environmental adaptations | 11 | $1,746 | $98 | $1,648 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 01 | $1,295 | $0 | $1,295 |
| Computers and related | 01 | $23 | $0 | $23 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 04 | $7,376 | $256 | $7,120 |
| Total | 35 | $13,423 | $398 | $13,025 |
D. Anecdote
Alejandro (not his real name) is a 15-year-old student with down syndrome. Her mother told us that Alejandro had wanted to ride a bike for years but he did not have the balance nor the motor coordination to use a regular bike. He had tried several sizes and models with no success. His physical therapist had suggested an adapted trike, but the prices made this option unattainable (about $1,283 for the recommended model - AmTryke ProSeries Foot Cycle 1416). Moreover, Alejandro did not want the "special" trike since he wanted to ride with his friends using a "typical bike". Through PRATP's Low Cost Device Design and Development (LD3) initiative Alejandro and her mother selected his own bike to be adapted according to Alejandro's particular needs. The finished product included custom stabilization wheels for balance, an extra-wide seat to improve stability, pedal foot straps to aid motor coordination, among other features (the total cost of materials was $53). The bike was beta-tested, fitted for size and range of motion and then given to Alejandro to take home. Now Alejandro can ride his typical bike having his special needs addressed by non-obtrusive "hidden" features.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 01 | 00 | 03 | 04 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 04 | 02 | 21 | 27 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 02 | 00 | 02 | 04 |
| 4. Subtotal | 07 | 02 | 26 | 35 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 07 | 02 | 26 | 35 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 07 | 02 | 26 | 35 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 35 | 100% |
| Satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 35 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
G. Notes:
Reutilization
A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices
| Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
|---|---|
| A. Device Exchange | 03 |
| B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 161 |
| C. Total | 164 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 02 |
| E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
| F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 162 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
B. Device Exchange Activities
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 03 | $3,350 | $0 | $3,350 |
| Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 03 | $3,350 | $0 | $3,350 |
C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 16 | $18,388 | $0 | $18,388 |
| Hearing | 01 | $659 | $0 | $659 |
| Speech Communication | 02 | $3,128 | $0 | $3,128 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 06 | $1,651 | $0 | $1,651 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 101 | $76,898 | $0 | $76,898 |
| Daily Living | 45 | $6,815 | $0 | $6,815 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 01 | $1,024 | $0 | $1,024 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 39 | $13,198 | $0 | $13,198 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 211 | $121,761 | $0 | $121,761 |
D. Anecdote
Mercedes (not her real name) is a 32 years old elementary school teacher who was referred to the Puerto Rico Assistive Technology Program (PRATP) by her co-workers. Mercedes has Spina Bifida and uses a manual wheelchair for mobility. However, one of the casters was badly damaged, resulting in an unsafe ride due to sudden movements and instability. Mercedes had been waiting for a new wheelchair form a local agency, but it was uncertain how much longer she would have to wait or even if she would finally get the wheelchair at all. Through PRATP’s AT Reuse program Mercedes received a wheelchair that fitted her needs at home and at school. Now she is back to teaching her classes, moving freely at home and school and performing her regular duties in and out of the classroom.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 10 | 02 | 86 | 98 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 05 | 02 | 30 | 37 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 04 | 00 | 10 | 14 |
| 4. Subtotal | 19 | 04 | 126 | 149 |
| 5. None of the above | 03 | 00 | 05 | 08 |
| 6. Subtotal | 22 | 04 | 131 | 157 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 03 | 00 | 02 | 05 |
| 8. Total | 25 | 04 | 133 | 162 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 76% | 100% | 94.74% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 159 | 96.95% |
| Satisfied | 03 | 1.83% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 02 | 1.22% |
| Total Surveyed | 164 | |
| Response rate % | 98.78% |
G. Notes:
Device Loan
A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose
| Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
|---|---|
| Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 32 |
| Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 18 |
| Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 26 |
| Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 13 |
| Total | 89 |
B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower
| Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 71 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 03 |
| Representative of Education | 04 |
| Representative of Employment | 00 |
| Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 08 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 03 |
| Representatives of Technology | 00 |
| Total | 89 |
C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans
| Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 14 |
|---|
D. Types of Devices Loaned
| Type of AT Device | Number |
|---|---|
| Vision | 09 |
| Hearing | 06 |
| Speech Communication | 11 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 09 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 53 |
| Daily Living | 22 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 11 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 |
| Total | 121 |
E. Anecdote
Carlos (not his real name) is a very enthusiastic young man whom, due to cerebral palsy, has considerable mobility challenges. Several years ago he had used a walker to get around, but his motor capabilities decreased and, since then, his family used a transport wheelchair to move him around. Ene though Carlos used this wheelchairs for years, his parent kept searching for ways to increase his mobility and independence. Such search led them to the Puerto Rico Assistive Technology Program (PRATP). Through PRATP’s Device Loan program several options were explored until he was fitted into a Pacer Gait Trainer. On the first trial, Carlos started walking quite fast and non-stop throughout PRATP’s facilities. He was definitely eager to get back on his feet. It was a wonderful experience to see this young man that had to be pushed in a wheelchair to get into our Program suddenly moving around freely and greeting everyone he saw along the way with a huge smile on his face. Carlos took the equipment home for the duration of the loan period. During this time it became ever so evident that the gait trainer was the right technology to increase his mobility and functional capabilities. Not only his parents were amazed, but also every person that had seen him for years being pushed on a wheelchair. One of these persons was a friend of the family, whom after learning that the equipment was loaned, offered to buy one for Carlos. Now, Carlos uses his own Gait Trainer to move independently around his home, at the shopping mall, at his church and all around his community.
F. Access Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 11 | 01 | 18 | 30 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| Subtotal | 11 | 01 | 19 | 31 |
| Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Subtotal | 11 | 01 | 19 | 31 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| Total | 11 | 02 | 19 | 32 |
| Performance on this measure | 100% | 60.61% | 100% | |
G. Acquisition Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 00 | 20 | 24 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 02 | 00 | 07 | 09 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 05 | 01 | 10 | 16 |
| 4. Subtotal | 11 | 01 | 37 | 49 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
| 6. Subtotal | 11 | 01 | 41 | 53 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 03 | 04 |
| 8. Total | 12 | 01 | 44 | 57 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 94.42% | 100% | 86.15% | |
H. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 84 | 94.38% |
| Satisfied | 01 | 1.12% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 04 | 4.49% |
| Total Surveyed | 89 | |
| Response rate % | 95.51% |
I. Notes:
Device Demonstration
A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
|---|---|
| Vision | 64 |
| Hearing | 07 |
| Speech Communication | 98 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 48 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 04 |
| Daily Living | 03 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 15 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 34 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 |
| Total # of Devices Loaned | 273 |
B. Types of Participants
| Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 77 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 61 |
| Representatives of Education | 64 |
| Representatives of Employment | 23 |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 48 |
| Representative of Community Living | 42 |
| Representative of Technology | 01 |
| Total | 316 |
C. Number of Referrals
| Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
|---|---|
| Funding Source (non-AT program) | 00 |
| Service Provider | 02 |
| Vendor | 00 |
| Repair Service | 00 |
| Others | 00 |
| Total | 02 |
D. Anecdote
Amaya (not her real name) is an 11-years-old student with cerebral palsy who had difficulties controlling her alternative communication device. Due to involuntary movements and spasticity, it was very difficult, laborious and frustrating for her to activate the built-in switch of her communication system. Amaya’s mother contacted the Puerto Rico Assistive Technology Program (PRATP) seeking options to address this situation. An AT specialist discussed with Amaya and her mother the characteristics of various communication devices and the different access methods available. During a follow-up device demonstration service, an SPL and an OT demonstrated a dynamic communication device controlled through eye tracking. Amaya tried out the device and she was immediately able to control it and to select items on a communication board. It was an amazing experience for her family when she spontaneously started using an on-screen keyboard to write her name and her sister’s name in the communication device. As a result, Amaya’s mother decided to request the AT services necessary to obtain the device through the corresponding agency.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 128 | 23 | 109 | 260 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 |
| Subtotal | 128 | 24 | 111 | 263 |
| Have not made a decision | 05 | 01 | 00 | 06 |
| Subtotal | 133 | 25 | 111 | 269 |
| Nonrespondent | 03 | 00 | 01 | 04 |
| Total | 136 | 25 | 112 | 273 |
| Performance on this measure | 94.12% | 96% | 99.11% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 276 | 87.34% |
| Satisfied | 07 | 2.22% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 33 | 10.44% |
| Total | 316 | |
| Response rate % | 89.56% |
G. Notes:
Overall Performance Measures
Overall Acquisition Performance Measure
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 15 | 02 | 109 | 126 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 11 | 04 | 58 | 73 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 11 | 01 | 22 | 34 |
| 4. Subtotal | 37 | 07 | 189 | 233 |
| 5. None of the above | 03 | 00 | 09 | 12 |
| 6. Subtotal | 40 | 07 | 198 | 245 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 04 | 00 | 05 | 09 |
| 8. Total | 44 | 07 | 203 | 254 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 84.09% | 100% | 93.1% | 91.73% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 75% | 75% | 75% | 75% |
| Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Overall Access Performance Measure
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 139 | 24 | 127 | 290 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 01 | 03 | 04 |
| Subtotal | 139 | 25 | 130 | 294 |
| Have not made a decision | 05 | 01 | 00 | 06 |
| Subtotal | 144 | 26 | 130 | 300 |
| Nonrespondent | 03 | 01 | 01 | 05 |
| Total | 147 | 27 | 131 | 305 |
| Performance on this measure | 94.56% | 92.59% | 99.24% | 96.39% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Training
A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution
| Type of Participant | Number |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 226 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 121 |
| Representatives of Education | 1,747 |
| Representatives of Employment | 76 |
| Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 95 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 828 |
| Representatives of Technology | 11 |
| Unable to Categorize | 291 |
| TOTAL | 3,104 |
| Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2,966 | 116 | 313 | 3,395 |
B. Training Topics
| Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
|---|---|
| AT Products/Services | 2,217 |
| AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 235 |
| Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 90 |
| Combination of any/all of the above | 842 |
| Transition | 11 |
| Total | 3,395 |
B. Description of Training Activities
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
During FY 2017, PRATP held three Regional Conferences entitled “Universal Design: Fusion of Technologies” in the northern and eastern areas of the Island. Hundreds of participants attended the conferences including persons with disabilities, family members and service providers representing agencies related to education, health, technology and community living. Immediately after the presentations, a group of AT specialists conducted device demonstrations so that participants could try out technology options addressing their particular needs.
Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Technical assistance activity related to transition reported
Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
PRATP’s AT specialist on Information Technology and Computer Access conducted a series of training sessions to the University of Puerto Rico (UPR) on creating accessible documents, as part of the implementation of Local Law 238. Throughout the year, these sessions were held at various campuses of the UPR throughout the Island. During this period, PRATP also provided individual support to UPR professors, webmasters, and librarians on how to improve the accessibility in webpages and other documents such as syllabi, presentations, etc.
D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
| Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
|---|---|
| IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 51 |
| Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented | 27 |
| No known outcome at this time | 03 |
| Nonrespondent | 09 |
| Total | 90 |
| Performance Measure Percentage | 86.7% |
| RSA Target Percentage | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Met |
E. Notes:
Technical Assistance
A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance
| Education | 67% |
|---|---|
| Employment | 2% |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 11% |
| Representative of Community Living | 12% |
| Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 8% |
| Total | 100% |
B. Description of Technical Assistance
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
The Puerto Rico Assistive Technology (PRATP) provided technical assistance to the Puerto Rico Telecommunications Regulatory Board (JRTPR) for the inclusion of accessible software in computers available at their Internet Access Centers located in municipalities throughout the island. PRATP’s AT specialists in the areas of computer access, vision and information technology participated in the evaluation, selection, configuration and training process. Free accessible software options were evaluated to find the best fit for the needs of people with disabilities. The recommended software was downloaded and installed by the JRTPR and the PRATP specialists provided support and training throughout the entire process.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
The Puerto Rico Assistive Technology (PRATP) provided technical assistance to state university personnel in charge of the implementation of Local Law 238 for the revision and amendment of Certification 111, 2014-2015. This document addresses the new requirements established by the “Law of Extended Admission, Reasonable Accommodation and Retention of Students with Disabilities or Functional Diversity Transitioning From Secondary Schools to Post-Secondary Degrees”. The amendments strengthen the public policy for the admission and retention of students with disabilities at these institutions.
C. Notes:
Public Awareness
Public Awareness Narratives
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. On October 2016, the Puerto Rico Assistive Technology Program (PRATP) participated in the AARP Independent Living Pavilion at the Baby Boomers Expo celebrated in the Puerto Rico Convention Center. Thousands of participants 50 years and over attended the event which was covered by all major media around the Island. At PRATP’s booth, people had first –hand contact with assistive technologies, learned about options to increase accessibility, attended AT device demonstrations, etc. The main focus of PRATP’s participation was on “Aging in place technologies”, low cost technologies and universal design.
Information And Assistance
| Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 256 | 51 | 307 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 248 | 53 | 301 |
| Representative of Education | 79 | 23 | 102 |
| Representative of Employment | 08 | 02 | 10 |
| Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 53 | 07 | 60 |
| Representative of Community Living | 59 | 05 | 64 |
| Representative of Technology | 06 | 01 | 07 |
| Unable to Categorize | 04 | 00 | 04 |
| Total | 713 | 142 | 855 |
Notes:
State Improvement Outcomes
| State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
|---|
A. State Improvements
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
PRATP led the drafting of an Amendment Project to allow the General Services Administration to dispose of reusable AT equipment by transfer, sale, assignment or donation, to the Puerto Rico Assistive Technology Program, to the Executive Branch of the government, to public corporations and to municipalities.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
Passing of Local Law 148 (2016) to add a subsection (f) to Article 19 of the Reorganization Plan No. 3-2011, known as the "2011 Reorganization Plan for the General Services Administration of Puerto Rico". The full document can be obtained at: http://www.lexjuris.com/lexlex/Leyes2016/lexl2016148.htm
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Technology (ICT accessibility and AT
B. State Improvements
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Additional And Leveraged Funds
Additional and Leveraged Funds
| Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
|---|
A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds |
|---|---|---|
| State Appropriations | $30,000 | Reuse |
| State Appropriations | $50,000 | Public Awareness, I&A |
| State Appropriations | $50,000 | Training |
| State Appropriations | $20,000 | Demonstration |
| State Appropriations | $35,000 | Technical Assistance |
| State Appropriations | $40,000 | Device Loan |
| State Appropriations | $45,000 | State Financing |
| Amount: $270,000 |
B. Leveraged Funding for Activities Not in State Plan (data not previously reported in other activity sections)
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Individuals Served | Other Outcome |
|---|
C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).
Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Fri May 04 2018 15:33:09 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)