Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | No |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | No |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | NaN% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | NaN% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | NaN% |
Total Surveyed | 00 | |
Response rate % | NaN% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 12 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 108 |
C. Total | 120 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 120 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 01 | $500 | $25 | $475 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 01 | $1,000 | $200 | $800 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 05 | $47,040 | $2,230 | $44,810 |
Daily Living | 03 | $8,100 | $1,100 | $7,000 |
Environmental Adaptations | 01 | $3,000 | $0 | $3,000 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 01 | $16,900 | $5,000 | $11,900 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 12 | $76,540 | $8,555 | $67,985 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 06 | $8,006 | $0 | $8,006 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 20 | $63,281 | $0 | $63,281 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 04 | $6,409 | $0 | $6,409 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 44 | $50,054 | $0 | $50,054 |
Daily Living | 11 | $3,683 | $0 | $3,683 |
Environmental Adaptations | 04 | $460 | $0 | $460 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 16 | $6,336 | $0 | $6,336 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 03 | $445 | $0 | $445 |
Total | 108 | $138,674 | $0 | $138,674 |
October 30, 2016 a physical therapist borrowed a “reassigned” Pacer gait trainer with several positioning components form our Charlotte AT center for a child on her caseload. In February 2017, the therapist, child and parents returned to the AT center. Originally, the child would just stand with assistance. She did not walk or move once standing. After using the Pacer gait trainer, she progressed to walking. The therapist then removed the positioning components on the trainer. In February the child, dad and therapist came back to the center to return the Pacer to the reassignment program and to try a different less supportive style walker. The AT Consultant provided them an open ended loan of a Gator walker without any positioning components. The therapist and the AT Consultant both think that in a short-time they will be back to look at a different style and even less supportive walker. If the family had to purchase this equipment, the Pacer would have cost approximately $2000.00 AND would have taken 2 to 3 months to obtain. By using the reassignment program, they received the device immediately and within 4 months she had progressed to a less supportive piece of equipment. The loaned (open-ended) Gator walker would have been approximately $400.00. This is a total cost savings to the family and/or medical insurance of $2,600.00. In addition, the little girl became much more independent and gave the AT consultant a big hug and a thank you for giving her a “pretty blue walker” to take home.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 15 | 03 | 65 | 83 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 05 | 03 | 18 | 26 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
4. Subtotal | 20 | 06 | 84 | 110 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
6. Subtotal | 20 | 06 | 86 | 112 |
7. Nonrespondent | 03 | 03 | 02 | 08 |
8. Total | 23 | 09 | 88 | 120 |
9. Performance on this measure | 86.96% | 66.67% | 95.45% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 111 | 92.5% |
Satisfied | 09 | 7.5% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 120 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
NCATP continues to develop our reassignment program. We have now opened small reassignment centers within our Raleigh and Charlotte AT centers.
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 942 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 22 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 278 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 358 |
Total | 1,600 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 334 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 292 |
Representative of Education | 246 |
Representative of Employment | 18 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 662 |
Representatives of Community Living | 44 |
Representatives of Technology | 04 |
Total | 1,600 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 14 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number |
---|---|
Vision | 114 |
Hearing | 26 |
Speech Communication | 438 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 202 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 108 |
Daily Living | 228 |
Environmental Adaptations | 126 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 02 |
Computers and Related | 304 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 52 |
Total | 1,600 |
Lynn has worked with NCATP since 2002. She was diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis and was having difficulty managing basic activities of daily living. Initially, NCATP showed Lynne strategies that would help her use a computer and access kitchen appliances from her wheelchair. Lynn borrowed several independent living devices assisting her in the kitchen and with her daily living/dressing needs. She also borrowed a keyboard and mouse that allowed her to access the computer. She was grateful for being able to better manage routine daily tasks. However, it was her new-found access to using her computer that led Lynn to champion assistive technology services for herself, her family and the entire state of North Carolina! Growing up, Lynn loved to write, and that passion was reintroduced to her with assessable computer access. As the Multiple Sclerosis progressed, Lynn lost the ability to speak and use her extremities, she once again thought that was the end of her life long passion for writing. NCATP was able to show her how she could use eye control for both spoken and written communication and provided her a short-term loan of an eye control and speech communication system while assisting her with a funding application. Lynn excelled using the technology. However, the Multiple Sclerosis continued to progress, and she was eventually admitted to a hospice facility. It was then that she decided to write her own book, using the eye gaze computer, one letter selected at a time. In 2013 her book “Living Among the Dying” was published. In her book Lynn expresses her journey finding joy and happiness in the midst of a debilitating disease. Without the assistive technology to enable her expression, her wisdom and compassion would be forever lost.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 252 | 34 | 473 | 759 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 04 | 01 | 12 | 17 |
Subtotal | 256 | 35 | 485 | 776 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 02 | 16 | 19 |
Subtotal | 257 | 37 | 501 | 795 |
Nonrespondent | 56 | 12 | 79 | 147 |
Total | 313 | 49 | 580 | 942 |
Performance on this measure | 87.25% | 78.13% | 87.81% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 05 | 07 | 10 | 22 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 238 | 21 | 79 | 338 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 100 | 72 | 87 | 259 |
4. Subtotal | 343 | 100 | 176 | 619 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 343 | 100 | 176 | 619 |
7. Nonrespondent | 20 | 06 | 13 | 39 |
8. Total | 363 | 106 | 189 | 658 |
9. Performance on this measure | 96.35% | 96.25% | 95.42% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 1,562 | 97.63% |
Satisfied | 34 | 2.13% |
Satisfied somewhat | 04 | 0.25% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 1,600 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
The NCATP database crashed during fy 2016 and all data and equipment records were lost. This impacted the data for this fiscal year due to having limited capability to collect required data elements. During this fiscal, NCATP created an internal access data collection system and entered all equipment. The system was fully functional during the last 6 months of the year; therefore, loan data in this section reflects loans provided for half of the federal fiscal year.
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 52 |
Hearing | 44 |
Speech Communication | 930 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 98 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 50 |
Daily Living | 132 |
Environmental Adaptations | 142 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 02 |
Computers and Related | 434 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 10 |
Total # of Devices Loaned | 1,894 |
Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 1,510 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 1,420 |
Representatives of Education | 270 |
Representatives of Employment | 142 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 542 |
Representative of Community Living | 156 |
Representative of Technology | 308 |
Total | 4,348 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 244 |
Service Provider | 240 |
Vendor | 350 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 834 |
In the past year the Charlotte NCATP center hosed visitors from the countries of Nigeria, China, and Georgia. The visitors were shown demonstrations of several types of assistive technology including items for computer access, low vision, daily living, and communication. The delegates who were from organizations working with individuals with disabilities in their respective countries were interested in assisting people in their communities to obtain these types of devices. Most delegates mentioned that their goal was to help individuals have access to assistive technology devices and to remain independent.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 384 | 264 | 1,076 | 1,724 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
Subtotal | 384 | 264 | 1,078 | 1,726 |
Have not made a decision | 54 | 15 | 99 | 168 |
Subtotal | 438 | 279 | 1,177 | 1,894 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 438 | 279 | 1,177 | 1,894 |
Performance on this measure | 87.67% | 94.62% | 91.59% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 4,250 | 97.75% |
Satisfied | 92 | 2.12% |
Satisfied somewhat | 06 | 0.14% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 4,348 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Data above reflects 1 year of service.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 20 | 10 | 75 | 105 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 243 | 24 | 97 | 364 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 100 | 72 | 88 | 260 |
4. Subtotal | 363 | 106 | 260 | 729 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
6. Subtotal | 363 | 106 | 262 | 731 |
7. Nonrespondent | 23 | 09 | 15 | 47 |
8. Total | 386 | 115 | 277 | 778 |
9. Performance on this measure | 94.04% | 92.17% | 93.86% | 93.7% |
ACL Performance Measure | 75% | 75% | 75% | 75% |
Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 636 | 298 | 1,549 | 2,483 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 04 | 01 | 14 | 19 |
Subtotal | 640 | 299 | 1,563 | 2,502 |
Have not made a decision | 55 | 17 | 115 | 187 |
Subtotal | 695 | 316 | 1,678 | 2,689 |
Nonrespondent | 56 | 12 | 79 | 147 |
Total | 751 | 328 | 1,757 | 2,836 |
Performance on this measure | 85.22% | 91.16% | 88.96% | 88.22% |
ACL Performance Measure | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 194 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 74 |
Representatives of Education | 496 |
Representatives of Employment | 51 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 57 |
Representatives of Community Living | 247 |
Representatives of Technology | 216 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 |
TOTAL | 1,335 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
841 | 494 | 00 | 1,335 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 306 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 23 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 82 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 712 |
Transition | 212 |
Total | 1,335 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
Two of NCATP’s Speech Language Pathologist, Lauren Zubow and Celeste Helling, conducted a workshop session titled AAC Decision Making for Adult Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities; Framework and Case Study Review at the American Speech-Language Hearing (ASHA) Convention held in Los Angeles California. The presentation was designed to assist clinicians working with adult clients in need of an augmentative communication systems. This population includes individuals with intellectual disability, autism, cerebral palsy, and deafness. Individuals typically have varying degrees of functional communication and understanding of language. Given the complexity of the AAC evaluation process, the diversity of persons requiring quality assessments and the overwhelming choices of assistive technology devices and AAC systems, the team provided processes for a systematic, comprehensive approach to observing and interpreting communication behaviors critical to the goal of successful AAC use. Using current research and evidence based practice, this presentation addressed the evaluation and recommendation process for this population from a clinical standpoint and provided case study reflections on successes and failures as well as ideas for implementation of evidence based practices relevant to adult individuals with intellectual disabilities.
Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
A 21-year-old student with intellectual, speech, and visual impairments was referred to NCATP during her final months of classes at the UNC-Chapel Hill campus where they teach functional, educational tasks as the students prepare to transition into community and employment settings. While in school the student used the school’s iPad and her own iPhone with apps to assist with educational and community tasks. Her iPhone was difficult for her to see due to her visual impairment. Her teacher also stated that the student’s communication may be difficult for others to understand “sometimes” even with familiar listeners. The NCATP referral was made to help with the transition process as she moved into her first apartment and to increase her responsibilities at her job (dining room attendant at a restaurant) by creating a visual schedule to learn new tasks. The AT specialist recommended that the student obtain an iPad with apps for communication, work organization, reminders, and banking. The AT consultant also recommended an app to create a video resume showing the employer her skill sets and strengths. For independent living assistance, the Amazon Echo was demonstrated and recommended to control her lights (on, off and different colors), music, and to set up alarms/reminders, obtain recipes, get weather updates, stay organized/manage time, create to do and shopping lists, and several other daily living tasks including the Ask My Buddy skill which will allow her to call designated contacts for assistance if needed. The student reports that she “loves it” and her staff/family states that they are optimistic about her increasing her independence with the new technology that is in place.
Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
At the request of the State Employees Credit Union of the Carolinas, NCATP and Disability Rights North Carolina conducted a joint presentation on web accessibility and its legal ramifications on Sept. 12, 2017. Holly Stiles, Senior Attorney with Disability Rights North Carolina and Lynne Deese, Assistive Technologist with North Carolina Assistive Technology conducted both an online and face-to-face presentation entitled Accessibility: Good Business Practice and Legally Required. Ms. Stiles mapped out the impact of web accessibility as a civil right while Ms. Deese introduced the aspects of creating a perceivable, operable, understandable and robust web site (POUR Site). Resources such as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, lists of tools for analyzing web site accessibility, suggested assistive technology for evaluating sites as well as companies that provide assessment services were offered to participants.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 48 |
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented | 26 |
No known outcome at this time | 08 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 82 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 90.2% |
RSA Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 12% |
---|---|
Employment | 38% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 13% |
Representative of Community Living | 13% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 24% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
Tammy Koger, NCATP Director, has been working with NC Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and the Division of Services for the Blind for the past year addressing accommodations and accessibility requirements for their new case management system, ENCORE. Technical assistance has been provided to the project management team to ensure that the request for proposal covers accessibility across all function areas. The RFP includes accommodations for vision, hearing, mobility, and learning disabilities. Specific interest and assistance has been provided in the area of tracking and working with students in transition. Due to the system requiring an interface for the students and the counselors, NCATP has provided feedback and assistance regarding required features for accessibility that will allow students and others to access the system via tablets and/or phones.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
In the spring of 2017, NCATP hosted two workshops focusing on military veterans and farming. The workshops “Addressing the Needs of the Veteran Farmer” was co-hosted with NC A&T University and took place in the western and eastern parts of the state. Veterans transitioning out of the military or who had recently transitioned who were interested in occupations in farming were invited to speak and take part in the one day workshops. Workshop sessions focused on state and federal resources for veterans and farmers; assistive technology and farm assessments; entrepreneurship, and the NC AgrAbility program. Veterans were provided demonstrations on farm equipment, farm safety, and several types of assistive technology for farming. Referrals for several farmers were made to local and state agencies such as the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, NC Farm Services, and the Farm Bureau. Due to the success of the workshops, NCATP has established relationships with the NC Farmer Veteran P
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. For the sixth year, NCATP partnered with the NC Rehabilitation Association (NCRA) to co-host the annual GREAT conference (Global Rehabilitation Enhanced with Assistive Technology). Over 400 people attended the conference with approximately 275 attendees being rehabilitation counselors and job placement specialist. The event workshops focused on assistive technology, ethics, rehabilitation engineering, employment, and transitioning. In addition to the training, 48 state and local exhibitors, including 25 assistive technology vendors, supported the conference in the free and open to the public exhibit hall where approximately 150 people visited.
2. The NCATP Director and Lynne Deese, Media and Training Specialist, provided an on-line webinar for the University of North Carolina(UNC) in Chapel Hill Developmental Disability Training Institute (DDTI) staff on assistive technology and durable medical equipment funding. The training was attended by 20 plus people working with individuals in therapy, hospital, and educational settings. The topic focused on resources for AT funding, as well as DME funding, and covered NC Medicaid, Medicare, Tricare, state agency resources such as DVRS, DSDHH, and DSB.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 1,142 | 66 | 1,208 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 720 | 172 | 892 |
Representative of Education | 516 | 02 | 518 |
Representative of Employment | 598 | 02 | 600 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 1,298 | 64 | 1,362 |
Representative of Community Living | 718 | 20 | 738 |
Representative of Technology | 320 | 20 | 340 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 5,312 | 346 | 5,658 |
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds |
---|---|---|
State Appropriations | $188,415 | Training |
State Appropriations | $188,417 | Demonstration |
State Appropriations | $18,943 | Reuse |
State Appropriations | $188,417 | Device Loan |
State Appropriations | $188,415 | Public Awareness, I&A |
State Appropriations | $188,415 | Technical Assistance |
Amount: $961,022 | ||
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Individuals Served | Other Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|
Private | $161,896 | Demonstration | 869 | NCATP served 869 individuals providing assessments |
Amount: $161,896 | Individuals Served: 869 |
N/A
Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Fri May 04 2018 15:28:09 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)