Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 03 | 00 | 03 |
Approved Not made | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Rejected | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Total | 04 | 00 | 04 |
Lowest Income: | $25,944 | Highest Income: | $71,000 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$122,732 | 03 | $40,911 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 00 | 02 | 00 | 00 | 01 | 00 | 03 |
Percentage of Loans | 0% | 66.67% | 0% | 0% | 33.33% | 0% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 03 | 100% |
Partnership Loans | 0% | |
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 03 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 03 | $3,953 |
Partnership Loans | 00 | $0 |
Total | 03 | $3,953 |
Lowest | 4% |
---|---|
Highest | 4% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
12 | 03 | 4% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 03 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 00 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 03 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 |
Hearing | 01 | $850 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 01 | $2,389 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 00 | $0 |
Computers and related | 01 | $714 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 03 | $3,953 |
Number Loans in default | 00 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $0 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
A customer contacted the alternative financing program (DC FUND$) to acquire a bariatric bed. The customer was renting a bariatric bed for $350.00 per month. The loan was approved for $2389.00, with a much lower monthly payment than the rental. Over 12 months the loan will be paid off, resulting in owning the bed and significant savings.
A senior customer who needed an iPad contacted DC Fund$ for a loan which would help her launch her new app, 12@12NOON. The loan was successfully approved in the amount of $714.00 She is now able to use the iPad to make professional presentations to educators and others, along with lesson plans for literacy organizations that teach adult learners.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 01 | 02 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 03 | 100% |
Satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 03 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
The DC Office of Aging provided additional funding for “Safe at Home”, which offers home accessibility modification grants that reduce the risk of falls, and reduce barriers that limit mobility. This program offers up to $10,000 for eligible seniors (80% of AMI) and persons with disabilities. Given some overlap with the AFP program, some our potential consumer base will use this funding option to obtain assistive technology devices.
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 477 |
C. Total | 477 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 477 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 01 | $70 | $0 | $70 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 295 | $76,932 | $0 | $76,932 |
Daily Living | 642 | $46,434 | $67 | $46,367 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 14 | $910 | $0 | $910 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 952 | $124,346 | $67 | $124,279 |
DC SHARES was contacted by an individual requesting a manual wheelchair. The client was currently using a transport chair that had a broken back frame that she propelled with her feet. The client did not have any insurance (Medicaid pending). She spoke about how uncomfortable the sling seat and back upholstery was on the broken wheelchair. DC SHARES provided a manual tilt-n-space wheelchair with a solid seat ($3000) and a Comfort Plus back and seat cushion ($500). DC Shares saved the client $3500 for equipment and more importantly the person had the mobility and independence pending Medicaid approval for new wheelchair.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 03 | 04 | 196 | 203 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 83 | 84 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 190 | 190 |
4. Subtotal | 03 | 05 | 469 | 477 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 03 | 05 | 469 | 477 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 03 | 05 | 469 | 477 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 470 | 98.53% |
Satisfied | 05 | 1.05% |
Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.42% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 477 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 09 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 01 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 01 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 01 |
Total | 12 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 01 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 01 |
Representative of Education | 02 |
Representative of Employment | 02 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 05 |
Representatives of Community Living | 00 |
Representatives of Technology | 01 |
Total | 12 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number |
---|---|
Vision | 01 |
Hearing | 01 |
Speech Communication | 03 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 |
Daily Living | 00 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 15 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 |
Total | 20 |
A laptop with screen magnification software and a handheld video magnifier were borrowed by a member of the ATPDC Advisory Council. The member is awaiting similar equipment through the DC vocational rehabilitation agency. The client has used assistive technology for many years and the AT specialist gave some instruction on how to use the software and devices. She reported that this equipment would help her immensely in her search for employment and expressed continued satisfaction with the device loan program.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 06 | 01 | 01 | 08 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
Subtotal | 07 | 01 | 01 | 09 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 07 | 01 | 01 | 09 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 07 | 01 | 01 | 09 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 01 | 00 | 01 |
4. Subtotal | 01 | 01 | 01 | 03 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 01 | 01 | 01 | 03 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 01 | 01 | 01 | 03 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 05 | 41.67% |
Satisfied | 06 | 50% |
Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 8.33% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 12 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
The AT Device Loan program includes AT devices that range from high-tech to low tech items that may be used in a variety of settings (home, community, school, work). The equipment that can be borrowed is limited because the DC AT Resource Center uses the same assistive technology devices to conduct demonstrations. The AT Device Loan program is the only statewide program device loan that is cross-age and cross¬ disability.
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 53 |
Hearing | 17 |
Speech Communication | 23 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 27 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 08 |
Daily Living | 08 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 56 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 01 |
Total # of Devices Loaned | 193 |
Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 72 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 17 |
Representatives of Education | 40 |
Representatives of Employment | 03 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 34 |
Representative of Community Living | 22 |
Representative of Technology | 06 |
Total | 194 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 28 |
Service Provider | 47 |
Vendor | 10 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 85 |
The AT Specialist discussed and demonstrated several AT solutions for a 94 year-old woman with communication issues due to a recent stroke. The client was accompanied by her aging-in-place advocate who stated that her client requires basic communication for wants, needs and emergencies. The woman owns an iPad and was shown several simple apps with pre-programmed sentences and words. The client decided that the apps with speech output disabled would best meet her needs. The AT specialist provided download information for several similar no-cost apps and both guests were very satisfied with the outcome of their visit to the Assistive Technology Resource Center.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 74 | 35 | 65 | 174 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 00 | 11 | 12 |
Subtotal | 75 | 35 | 76 | 186 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 02 | 02 | 05 |
Subtotal | 76 | 37 | 78 | 191 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 01 | 01 | 02 |
Total | 76 | 38 | 79 | 193 |
Performance on this measure | 98.68% | 92.11% | 96.2% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 145 | 74.74% |
Satisfied | 46 | 23.71% |
Satisfied somewhat | 03 | 1.55% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 194 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 05 | 198 | 207 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 84 | 85 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 01 | 190 | 191 |
4. Subtotal | 04 | 07 | 472 | 483 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 04 | 07 | 472 | 483 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 04 | 07 | 472 | 483 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
ACL Performance Measure | 75% | 75% | 75% | 75% |
Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 80 | 36 | 66 | 182 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 02 | 00 | 11 | 13 |
Subtotal | 82 | 36 | 77 | 195 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 02 | 02 | 05 |
Subtotal | 83 | 38 | 79 | 200 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 01 | 01 | 02 |
Total | 83 | 39 | 80 | 202 |
Performance on this measure | 98.8% | 92.31% | 96.25% | 96.53% |
ACL Performance Measure | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 00 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 00 |
Representatives of Education | 43 |
Representatives of Employment | 07 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 41 |
Representatives of Community Living | 00 |
Representatives of Technology | 00 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 |
TOTAL | 91 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
91 | 00 | 00 | 91 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 07 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 00 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 76 |
Transition | 08 |
Total | 91 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
The AT Specialist provided training to 25 graduate level speech language pathology students enrolled in an assistive technology course at the University of the District of Columbia. The training covered the basics of assistive technology and focused on how the speech language therapist is called upon to support AT users in the classroom and in community living. Hands on training was also provided on adapted hardware and software with particular attention given to augmentative and alternative communication devices. Participants reported that the training provided valuable insight and “real world” knowledge.
Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
The AT Consultant provided training to seven direct service staff at the Lt. Joseph P. Kennedy Institute of Catholic Charities as a part of their supported employment program to discuss readily available technology for adults with disabilities in the workplace and vocational learning environment. This training was entitled “What’s in your Toolkit!”, and the staff learned how assistive technology could assist various employees on job sites and with learning workplace skills. As they brainstormed, ideas of how the technology could be used on the go helping the workers to become more independent. Next, there were questions and request for further apps and online resources. Also, technical assistance was requested to assist with implementation strategies both in the classroom and workplace.
Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 00 |
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented | 00 |
No known outcome at this time | 00 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 00 |
Performance Measure Percentage | NaN% |
RSA Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Not Met |
ATPDC receives additional funding from the Mid-Atlantic ADA Center to provide specialized training sessions related to AT@ Work, Emergency Preparedness and Assistive Technology, AT for Hospitality and AT and the Aging Workforce. This data is reflected in this reporting period training activities.
Education | 33.34% |
---|---|
Employment | 0% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 0% |
Representative of Community Living | 33.33% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 33.33% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
The Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia (ATPDC) staff and a network of disability rights consumers, advocates and other volunteers provided technical assistance to University Legal Services (ULS) and DC Office of Board of Elections conducted accessibility surveys of polling sites throughout the District of Columbia for the Presidential Election on November 8, 2016. The goal is to ensure the full participation in the electoral process of persons with disabilities, including registering to vote, casting a vote and accessing polling place.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
The Assistive Technology Specialist provided technical assistance to the Disability Resource Center of the University of the District of Columbia. Technical assistance will be ongoing and involves the development of appropriate protocols and procedures relative to the referral, assessment, procurement and implementation of assistive technology devices for students with disabilities. The AT Specialist will also directly assist students through demonstrations, device trials, short trainings and information and referral.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. The ATPDC hosted several “Learn and Share” Open House for demonstrations of a state-of-the-art assistive technology device. These events are a collaborative effort between ATPDC and AT vendors to increase awareness of new emerging assistive technology to consumers, family members and organizations. Participants increased their knowledge of the benefits of these AT devices and participants were able to try out the devices.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 862 | 79 | 941 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 963 | 74 | 1,037 |
Representative of Education | 39 | 03 | 42 |
Representative of Employment | 23 | 03 | 26 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 245 | 06 | 251 |
Representative of Community Living | 405 | 23 | 428 |
Representative of Technology | 19 | 07 | 26 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 | 05 | 05 |
Total | 2,556 | 200 | 2,756 |
The Assistive Technology Program for the District of Columbia (ATPDC) uses a multifaceted approach that includes mailings, website, publications, public service announcements, local cable TV advertising, and participation with other agencies, conferences, exhibits, presentations, and trainings to increase awareness of the benefits of AT devices and services. During this reporting period ATPDC developed their social media content for Facebook. Most consumers contact the ATPDC via telephone after referring to our website.
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | No |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds |
---|---|---|
Federal | $1,000 | Training |
Amount: $1,000 |
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Individuals Served | Other Outcome |
---|
Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Fri May 04 2018 15:21:32 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)